(If you’re curious, my review process. It’s also pasted at the end of this post. I don’t believe in Rotten Tomatoes. I just believe in me.)
(***all-purpose SPOILER ALERT*** there may be some in this review)
SW SCORE: 42
4.2 out of 5 🐙
Clint Eastwood sure does love casting Morgan Freeman. I mean who am I kidding? If I had the chance to cast Morgan Freeman, I would do it in every single movie I directed. The man is the walking avatar of charisma. Eastwood is cool, too, but he’s more of a one-note guy. He’s always brooding and always angry and always upset. I agree he does his personality very well but it’s really always the same. And the story of a retired old dude coming out of his rest to fight bad guys is one of the most overused Hollywood storylines. But, all that bitching aside, pour yourself a sasparilla and enjoy this bravura western.
Review process: (this is always evolving, I’m sad to say. I’m more of a watcher who makes mostly unhelpful observations about things I have absorbed. I am not unlike a pop culture blob.)
Two scores are assigned: (I don’t believe in Rotten Tomatoes. I just believe in me)
(1) Shark Wrighter (SW) Score: Based on a sum of 5 sub-scores (acting, directing, writing/story, effects: cinematography &/or animation &/or effects, editing) with 1 being terrible and 10 being terrific.
(2) Octopuses (0-5 🐙, with 5 being fantastic and 0 being feces)
(3) Octopuses are my unquantifiable feeling…not that SW score is scientific…but this one is even less so
(4) ++ This optional section includes any incredibly *brilliant observations that don’t fit into simple quantitative slices like the scores and octopuses *(they are likely NOT brilliant)