Patch Adams (mini-review++)

r12

Review process: two scores assigned: (I don’t believe in Rotten Tomatoes. I just believe in me)

(***all-purpose SPOILER ALERT*** there may be some in this review)

(1) Shark Wrighter (SW) Score: Based on a sum of 5 sub-scores (acting, directing, writing/story, cinematography &/or animation &/or effects, editing) with 1 being terrible and 10 being terrific.

(2) Octopuses (0-5 🐙, with 5 being fantastic and 0 being feces)

(3) Octopuses are my unquantifiable feeling…not that SW score is scientific…but this one is even less so

The mini-review:

Patch Adams

acting 6

directing 6

writing 5

effects 5

editing 5

SW score: 27

2 out of 5 octopi

++ Even Steven Speilberg would watch this movie and think it was too saccharine. Look, the true story behind the movie is sweet and I’m all for alternative approaches to medicine. But this flick is about as predictable as the sun rising every morning. Williams is fine. But his character is thin. Hoffman is fine. But they are two-dimensional figures, not fully developed characters. Also, the cinematographer should be censured for egregious use of soft light effects.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.