Hook (1991) (mini-review++)

r03

(If you’re curious, my review process. It’s also pasted at the end of this post. I don’t believe in Rotten Tomatoes. I just believe in me.)

(***all-purpose SPOILER ALERT*** there may be some in this review)

The mini-review:

Hook

acting 6

directing 5

writing 4

effects 8

editing 5

SW score: 28

2 out of 5 octopi

++I loved the Disney Peter Pan version. The one from 1953. It had charm and heart and sure it had sappiness but it wasn’t entirely saccharine. Spielberg is not an edgy director nor do I look to his films for that vibe. But this one has no meat and potatoes with the pudding. The characters aren’t developed well at all. There are a lot of nice effects and things are put together well. But there’s no heart here.

Robin Williams is good, though. There aren’t many actors who can capture the energy of a kid like Robin Williams could. It’s a shame his talents were stuck in this flick.

.

.

.

(1) Shark Wrighter (SW) Score: Based on a sum of 5 sub-scores (acting, directing, writing/story, effects: cinematography &/or animation &/or effects, editing) with 1 being terrible and 10 being terrific.

(2) Octopuses (0-5 šŸ™, with 5 being fantastic and 0 being feces)

(3) Octopuses are my unquantifiable feelingā€¦not that SW score is scientificā€¦but this one is even less so

(4) ++ This optional section includes any incredibly *brilliant observations that don’t fit into simple quantitative slices like the scores and octopuses *(they are likely NOT brilliant)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.