Movie mini-reviews(++) explained (scripted fiction)

anton-ego-personnage-ratatouille-04b

So I’ve done a few movie reviews. And while no one asked for it, here’s my process explained: (I don’t believe in Rotten Tomatoes. I just believe in me):

Review process: two scores assigned:

(***all-purpose SPOILER ALERT*** there may be some in this review)

(1) Shark Wrighter (SW) Score: Based on a sum of 5 sub-scores (acting, directing, writing/story, effects: cinematography &/or animation &/or effects, editing) with 1 being terrible and 10 being terrific.

(2) Octopuses (0-5 🐙, with 5 being fantastic and 0 being feces)

(3) Octopuses are my unquantifiable feeling…not that SW score is scientific…but this one is even less so

(4) ++ This optional section includes any incredibly *brilliant observations that don’t fit into simple quantitative slices like the scores and octopuses *(they are likely NOT brilliant)

————————————–

EXAMPLE:

The mini-review:

The Empire Strikes Back

acting 9

directing 10

writing 10

effects 10

editing 10

SW score: 49

5 out of 5 octopi

++ content: (Sometimes I add a *sublime* ++note. Sometimes I don’t. If I do, I’m sorry.)

 

111 thoughts on “Movie mini-reviews(++) explained (scripted fiction)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.